Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-212.35.14.225-20150704132426/@comment-1672596-20150909104600

212.35.14.225 wrote: why is portable ops not anymore a canon spinoff? is it not canon? then why? You can thank Doulomb and his anti-Portable Ops and Rising agenda for that. What's worse is that he and an anon are claiming Bluerock said it was non-canon when if anything he specifically stated that while it was okay to not list them as main games, they should not list them as non-canon. Here's what he said exactly:

"Portable Ops and Revengeance content can definitely be segregated from the main saga content on the Wiki, without having to declare it non-canon. If that's the consensus among the user base then I'm all for it. --Bluerock (talk) 00:04, September 4, 2015 (UTC) "

Emphasis mine.