Board Thread:Metal Gear Solid V/@comment-6747658-20150826194634/@comment-1672596-20150828004751

0nighthawk0 wrote: Yet not a single other screenshot or video about the ending, which makes every confirmation on it hearsay. The guy who posted those two screenshots had earlier on his own Twitter account put another guy who claimed he had the game through a rigorous task of trying to prove he actually had it and was playing it (ie, he didn't just ask for a photo of the game disc alone or even a screenshot of the game in the background alone, but both together, and making sure that the images from the game do not line up to what was previously shown specifically to make sure someone isn't trying to con him with the claim that they had the game and using, say, footage from the demo to make it seem as though they had the game). That person who claimed he had the game proceeded to fold within two days. I doubt a person like that would just be spreading hearsay, and if anything would be very trustworthy of giving these information, and by extension, his anonymous source would definitely have to be very trustworthy as well. That's why I'm very sure this is indeed very reliable, reliable enough to actually use as a source. That's why we really SHOULD use it as a source, at least until the game is released. And besides, this also came from the Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain spoiler thread. Do you really think that the thread, where the entire POINT of its existence is to divulge spoilers for the game, whether at release or even before it if it broke the street date, would have people give spoilers that they had neither played the game themselves, nor even get the spoiler information from a guidebook or someone who was proven to be a very reliable source?