Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6512-20150908154921/@comment-1504072-20150911094556

Weedle McHairybug wrote: [...] Ah, so you admit line delivery CAN be misinterpreted, in regards to the example of your Dad. And you DO have some concept of context, in regards to your Sigint and Kefka examples. What inconsistent and contrary arguments you make.

As for the imbecilic "Cecile is actually a man" vs. "Cecile's English voice actor said a line of dialogue with a particular inflection or tone, so I can assume the character's exact thoughts" argumuent... The phrase "apples and oranges" comes to mind. A statement based on NO evidence, versus a statement based on flimsy evidence, are still both unreliable statements to be making. If you can't make the distinction, then leave it for more rational people to determine, rather than be a counterproductive nuisance on the Wiki.