Board Thread:Metal Gear Solid V/@comment-6747658-20150826194634/@comment-6747658-20150829201553

Guys....you're going majorly off-topic here. Also, Bluerock has cast his opinion on the matter:

Honestly, what's a few more days gonna cost when you will know EVERYTHING there is to know about the game? There'll be Youtube videos galore for you to nitpick to death come release day, Weedle. This Wiki is not a news site, where all information leaks are treated as potential scoops. If people really wanna read leaked and unverified information, they will go directly to the source; the Wiki should never present these as confirmed facts, even if they prove to be true in the end. Doing so is just unprofessional and contrary to the Wiki's purpose. -- Bluerock  ( talk ) 09:54, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not gonna read it due to potential spoilers (I don't even know what is meant by "a data text"). However, if this really confirmed anything, there wouldn't even be a debate, and since a lot of other users (the majority?) disagree with the leak's reliability, then it should just be disregarded. The truth will eventually be revealed, quit being so impatient. -- Bluerock  ( talk ) 11:22, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

I know what a "text dump" is, but "a data text" has no meaning to me because it could be anything. Also, I meant the majority of users involved in the debate, not everyone registered on the entire Wiki. Additionally, I could care less what Reddit chooses to do. If the Wiki community deems it unsuitable or unreliable for presentation as fact at this time, then it entirely CAN be disregarded. It'll easily be proven/disproved on September 1st. Now, you have my opinion on the matter, so good day to you. -- Bluerock  ( talk ) 12:12, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

So yeah, there's that.