Template talk:Canon?

I was thinking back on this, and... was this really a good idea?
I understand that some sources are actually questionable at best, but I think the idea of an Alternative History section, not to mention the "Canon?" Template was probably not too good of an idea. For one thing, technically, literally anything that's not within the main game could constitute as a "Canon?" or "Alternative Timeline" in itself since it isn't actually within the game itself, such as, besides the Novelizations and the official missions handbook, there is the instruction manuals themselves, the Metal Gear Solid 4 Database, the Other Operations documents in Metal Gear Solid, or the even the books from Metal Gear Solid 2, and the Document of Metal Gear Solid 2 and the Grand Game Plan for Metal Gear Solid 2, heck, even words from the creators themselves would constitute as such. I wasn't too keen for something like this, but I allowed for it to happen anyways. However, I'm still wondering if that was actually a good idea. Weedle McHairybug 01:52, November 12, 2010 (UTC)