Board Thread:Metal Gear Solid V/@comment-6747658-20150826194634/@comment-4950606-20150828023749

Weedle McHairybug wrote:

0nighthawk0 wrote: My stance on the leaked information is neutral, it is not that I am unwilling to believe them, it is just the situation around them that makes me skeptical about them, and sorry, but a lot of things about these leaks still look fishy.

Ultimately I do not care whether they are right or wrong, if they are true then that is that, and if they are wrong, then that is also that. That was never my point here, my point was the credibility of these sources, regardless of how reliable they may seem, and the fact the wiki pages were being edited on the basis of spoiler leaks, something that I view as wrong. Which I have pointed out several times. You may be neutral, but Kornflakes here was clearly against it. He refused to believe it, and even implied that anyone who even dared to cite those things was an idiot, even when several of the people who came to believe the leaks were themselves doubtful of its validity initially as well.

And wouldn't the fact that they are reliable mean they are credible? You can't be a credible source if you aren't reliable. Just because the source is reliable doesn't mean it's 100% fact it just means it's Highly Probable/Most likely/90% sure but otherwise unconfirmed and personally while I'm against the leak (and leaks in general because they ruin the fun for everyone else) I'll admit that Kornflakes was a bit harsh