Board Thread:Metal Gear Solid V/@comment-109.193.182.64-20150922080055/@comment-177.249.112.38-20151117210538

190.219.224.163 wrote: Like many have said. If MGS1 were for PS4 then Rex would look much much cooler and advanced, hell I bet it could have walked upright just like Sally.

The thing with Rex is that it was made as "an ultimate weapon"despite the hax of all metal gear games where they always go on saying "Yeah, metal gear the ultimate weapon" when things like Peace walker and Sally barely fits as ultimate weapons. Dont get me wrong they are very effective and better than every weapon in those eras but these are not invincible and have many flaws. Rex however was designed to be THAT machine that could go into the enemy territory and beat the crap out of the enemy and leave the area with little to no damage. That was the purpose of Rex armor to witstand pretty much anything.

being the ultimate machine and being invincible are not neccesary synonims, a lot of you seem to think that if somehting can be destroyed or defeated then it sucks and is lame

Sally was a pretty impressive machine capable of taking out several battalions of the russian forces, with relative ease so in 1984 Sally WAS the ultimate machine capable of waging chaos in the battlefield.

By the year 2000 we have a new ultimate machine which is REX Otacon states that an entire army would be capable of defeating REX, but that doesn't mean REX is lame even if a whole army of tanks and soldiers could destroy him he wouldn't go down without a fight I'm even willing to bet that he would be able to whipe out more than 80% of the atttackers before going down.