Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-166.137.88.23-20130610185107/@comment-80.75.99.120-20130622221354

Bluerock wrote:

80.75.99.120 wrote: Where is that function of the new FOXDIE explained? Way I understood it was basically same kind of FOXDIE than 9 years before (which could kill unharmed victim), only targets were different.

It's speculation. I said it may have functioned like that to explain why Liquid wasn't affected immediately. It targets people by their DNA, same as the earlier form, but beyond that, who knows.

Okay. Not bad theory. Though makes me wonder why would they make it neccessary for target to be in the wounded state in order for the virus to work, when it just makes it a lot less useful as an assasination tool? Unless ofcourse it was some kinda defect in programming of the virus.