Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-179.197.35.147-20140929015719/@comment-177.249.112.38-20151102022039

Buggynaut wrote:

93.42.19.115 wrote:

Jim Logan wrote: I'm gonna repeat my comment earlier, I'd rather see MGS6 go for a "future" feel, not just four years like Rising. I meant decades, at least twenty-thirty years after MGS4, a whole new cast, so the new writers have more room to work with. Personally I hate futuristic crap. We had enough nanomachines, son. If you set a MGS game in 2040s it will be pathetically worse than Sen. Armstrong.

My two cents I think it would be great if they did it in world war 2 with the boss. That was actually the original idea for MGSV hahahahahha well I think Kojima just ran out of ideas in MGS4 everything was nanomachines, heck the "nanomachines son!!" line in rising almost felt like an inside joke

then in MGSV everything was parasites literaly every fucking thing I'm surprised no one in the game says "parasites son!!!!"