Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6512-20150908154921/@comment-4792735-20150909230150


 * A wild stranger appears*

Weedle, you have done little very explanation as to why anything you say is correct, I.E this statement: " It actually was a relevant analogy."

The number one rule of any discussion/argument/whateveryouwanttocallthis is to explain why something is, not just that it is.

The actual problem, from what I understand, ahving read all of this thread, is bloating. What you described in your Bulbapedia example was not a small detail, as it is the identity of characters relevant to the plot. Personality is interpretation, tone does infer some meaning, but that meaning can still change from person to person. If I say 'I don't like you' in a neutral tone, you could take it aggressively. But maybe I know somebody called Yuu and am just making a statement. Not the best example, but it makes my point.

Now, I've forgotten what I was saying, so I'll leave it there.